Rep. Christopher H. Smith, Co-Chairman February 21, 2006 www.csce.gov
EUROPEAN COURT RULES IN CRITICAL CZECH DESEGREGATION CASE
Equal Access to Education for Roma Remains Goal
By Erika B. Schlager Counsel for International Law
Summary
In 1999, several Romani students from the Czech Republic brought a suit before the European Court on Human Rights alleging that their assignment to “special schools” for the mentally disabled was tainted by racial prejudice and therefore violated European human rights law. On February 7, 2006, a seven-member Chamber of the Court held that the applicants failed to prove that their placement in “special schools” was the singular result of intentional racial discrimination. The plaintiffs have 3 months to appeal to a 17-member Grand Chamber. Elsewhere in Central and Southern Europe, Roma are also pursuing efforts to achieve equal access to education.
Background
During the Communist-era, many East European countries developed a practice of channeling Roma into schools for children with mental disabilities, called “special schools.” Critics have argued that this practice constitutes, de facto, a form of segregating Roma into a separate and inferior school system.
The Ostrava Case
Unsatisfactory performance of Gypsy children in Czech and Slovak schools is often “solved” by transferring the children to special schools for the mentally retarded. During the school year of 1970-71 in the Czech lands alone, about 20% of Gypsy children attended these special schools as against only 3% of children from the rest of the population. According to psychological tests the great majority of these children should not be in these schools. This indiscriminate transferring of Gypsy children to these special schools, which is the general practice, reflects unfavorably on the whole Gypsy population. A child who “graduates” from such a school has the same standing as a child who did not finish his basic schooling. Access to better employment opportunities is closed. Even art schools are closed to them, while persons with special musical talent - not uncommon among Gypsies - are shunned. Musical and dance groups are interested in these talented persons, however, they cannot employ them.
The main reason for the unsatisfactory performances of Gypsy children is the fact that there are no schools which teach Gypsy culture and try to develop it. The powers that be are, on the contrary, doing everything to suppress Gypsy culture and the media assists in this destruction by spreading lies, such as that Gypsy culture does not exist. Gypsy children are forced to attend schools where they are taught in the Czech or Slovak language and where, from the pictures in the primer, they get the impression that they are foreign, that they are second class citizens, without their own language, without a past and without a future.
- Situation of the Gypsies in Czechoslovakia, Charter 77 Document No. 23, issued December 13, 1978 by Vaclav Havel and Dr. Ladislav Hejdanek, Charter 77 Spokesmen
In 1999, a group of Roma from Ostrava, the Czech Republic’s third largest city, brought suit against their government, alleging that their assignment to “special schools” for the mentally disabled was tainted by racial prejudice and therefore violated Czech national and constitutional law, as well as European human rights law.
At the time the case was brought, a number of Czech newspapers ran editorials indirectly espousing some form of school segregation. For example, one leading newspaper ran an article arguing that educating a “future plumber” and a “future brain surgeon” together ultimately benefits neither one.
On October 20, 1999, the Czech Constitutional Court rejected the plaintiffs’ claim. In the view of the court, it did not have the jurisdiction to address the broad pattern of discriminatory treatment alleged – allegations supported by compelling statistical evidence but no smoking gun that proved an explicit intent to discriminate against the individual plaintiffs.
Notwithstanding the Constitutional Court’s perceived jurisdictional inability to provide a remedy to the plaintiffs, the Court recognized “the persuasiveness of the applicants’ arguments” and “assume[d] that the relevant administrative authorities of the Czech Republic shall intensively and effectively deal with the plaintiffs’ proposals.”
Having exhausted their domestic remedies, the students then turned to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, an organ of the Council of Europe.
In connection with that suit, Case of D.H. and Others v. The Czech Republic, the Czech Government acknowledged that, nationwide, 75 percent of Czech Roma were channeled into special schools. In some special schools, Roma made up 80-90 percent of the student body. The Czech Government also acknowledged that “Roman[i] children with average or above-average intellect [we]re often placed in such schools” for children with mental disability.
In opposing the plaintiffs’ claims, the Czech Ministry of Education attempted to deflect an examination of whether their placement in schools for the mentally disabled was the result of racial bias by claiming (among other things) that Romani parents have a “negative attitude” toward education. This assertion was particularly ironic, given the lengths to which the plaintiffs’ parents were willing to go – all the way to Europe’s highest human rights court – to ensure their children could get a good education.
In countries with substantial Romani communities, it is commonplace for Romani children to attend schools that are largely comprised of Roma or to be relegated to Roma classes within mixed schools. In its most pernicious form, segregation is achieved by routing Romani children into “special schools” – schools for the mentally disabled – or into classes for mentally disabled children within regular schools.
- Report on the Situation of Roma and Sinti in the OSCE Area, issued by the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities, 2000
Moreover, this broad sweeping generalization, originally made before the Czech Constitutional Court, was viewed by some as confirmation of racial prejudice in the Czech education system. Remarkably, it was repeated without comment in the European Court’s decision. Putting aside the bias reflected in the Ministry of Education’s assertion, there is no evidence demonstrating that a parent’s “negative attitude” results in actual mental disability in his or her children.
Meanwhile, the Czech Government adopted some changes to the law on special schools which came into effect on January 1, 2005 (Law No. 561/2004) and on February 17, 2005 (Decree No. 73/2005). To some degree, these changes were reactive to the issues raised by the Ostrava suit, including the criticisms of the procedures by which parental consent was purportedly obtained for the placement of children in special schools. Nevertheless, non-governmental groups monitoring this situation argue that the changes have not dismantled an education system that remains effectively segregated and that the changes fail to provide redress or damages for the Romani plaintiffs from Ostrava who were denied equal access to mainstream schools.
The case in Strasbourg was heard by a seven-member Chamber of European Court and resulted in a 6-1 decision. Significantly, the President of the Chamber issued a concurring decision, in which he stated that some of the arguments of the dissenting judge were very strong. He also suggested that in order to hold that there had been a violation of the Convention in this case, the Chamber might have to depart from previous decisions of the Court. In his view, overturning or deviating from past rulings is a task better undertaken by the Grand Chamber of the Court. The applicants have three months to decide whether to appeal this decision to a 17-member Grand Chamber.
While the underlying issues which led Roma to bring this suit still persist, there are many indications that prejudices against Roma in the Czech Republic have diminished since the Ostrava case was first heard by the Czech Constitutional Court. For example, when the European Court issued its holding in the case, a leading daily paper wrote that although the Czech Government “won” its case, there were still significant problems for Roma in the Czech educational system that need to be addressed.
Limitations of the European Court Decision
Significantly, there were several issues the court did not address.
The suit in question was brought under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which is the non-discrimination provision of the Convention, in conjunction with Article 2 of Protocol 1 to the Convention, which provides for a right to education. In essence, discrimination in education based on race, ethnicity or social origin is prohibited.
When interpreting this standard, the Court referred to previous cases in which it held that States party to the European Convention “enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent differences in otherwise similar situations justify a difference in treatment.” The Court also reiterated “that the setting and planning of the curriculum falls in principle within the competence of the Contracting States.” In short, while European Convention norms prohibit discrimination in education, States still have considerable discretion in designing their education programs. But while the Court reiterated this jurisprudence, it failed to indicate what is meaningfully left of Articles 14 and Protocol 1, Article 2? What threshold must be crossed before the court will actually determine that alleged discrimination takes a case out of the discretion of the States party to the Convention and brings it within the reach of the Court?
Two other issues the court did not address do not relate so much to the court’s own jurisprudence, but from parallel developments in European Union norms in the field of non-discrimination.
The European Parliament [ . . . c]alls on Member States in which Roma children are segregated into schools for the mentally disabled or placed in separate classrooms from their peers to move forward with desegregation programmes within a predetermined period of time, thus ensuring free access to quality education for Roma children and preventing the rise of anti-Romani sentiment amongst school-children.
- European Parliament resolution on the situation of the Roma in the European Union, adopted April 25, 2005
In 2000, the European Union adopted “Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin,” more commonly known as the “Race Directive.” The directive is binding on all current 25 Member States of the European Union and is intended to ensure a minimum level of protection from race discrimination in all EU countries in several areas, including education. (The fifteen countries that were EU members as of 2000 had until July 19, 2003, to transfer the directive into national law; applicant countries had until the date of their accession. The Czech Republic joined the EU in 2004 but, in fact, it has not yet adopted comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation. Legislation was introduced in the parliament in late 2005, but the draft was narrowly rejected by the Senate in January 2006.)
The Race Directive requires Member States to adopt comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation that, among other things, requires anti-discrimination legislation to include both direct and indirect discrimination. Indirect discrimination, which is at issue in the Ostrava case, is defined by the directive as occurring when “an apparently neutral provision, criterion or practice would put persons of a racial or ethnic origin at a particular disadvantage compared with other persons, unless that provision, criterion or practice is objectively justified by a legitimate aim and the means of achieving that aim are proportionate and necessary.” The legislation should also shift the burden of proof in civil cases from the plaintiffs to the defendants once a prima facie case of discrimination has been made.
Thus, the EU Race Directive anticipates exactly the kind of case the plaintiffs in the Ostrava case presented. Under the provisions of the directive, the overwhelming pattern of disparate treatment of Roma demonstrated by the plaintiffs should shift the burden of proof from them to the Czech Government. (Notably, the directive was not applicable to the Czech Republic at the time of the Constitutional Court’s decision.)
While the European Court of Human Rights does not adjudicate compliance with or implementation of the EU Race Directive, the Court’s overall approach to the Ostrava case appears to lag behind the legal developments in the European Union and, potentially, render the European Court a less effective vehicle for addressing discrimination than other existing or emerging tools in Europe.
Regional Issues and Trends
On November 27, 2003, the OSCE Permanent Council adopted “Decision No. 566, Action Plan on Improving the Situation of Roma and Sinti within the OSCE Area.” In particular, that Action Plan calls on the participating States to “[e]nsure that national legislation includes adequate provisions banning racial segregation and discrimination in education and provides effective remedies for violations of such legislation.” In addition, participating States were urged to:
73. Develop and implement comprehensive school desegregation programmes aiming at:
(1) discontinuing the practice of systematically routing Roma children to special schools or classes (e.g., schools for mentally disabled persons, schools and classes exclusively designed for Roma and Sinti children); and
(2) transferring Roma children from special schools to mainstream schools.
74. Allocate financial resources for the transfer of the Roma children to mainstream education and for the development of school support programmes to ease the transition to mainstream education.
Thus, all OSCE participating States, including the Czech Republic, have agreed, in principle, to the goal of integrating Roma in education and eradicating de facto segregated school where it may exist.
In 2004, the European Roma Rights Center issued a report, Stigmata: Segregated Schooling of Roma in Central and Eastern Europe, examining the experiences of five countries (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia). The report describes the most common ways of segregating Romani children from non-Roma: channeling Roma into “special schools” for children with developmental disabilities; the de facto segregation that goes hand-in-hand with existence of Romani ghettos; having mixed-population schools where Romani children are segregated into all-Romani classes; and the refusal of some local authorities to enroll Romani children in mainstream schools. The report concludes that, unfortunately, “with the exception of Hungary, concrete government action aimed at desegregating the school system has not been initiated to date.”
In addition to the countries examined in Stigmata, the European Roma Rights Center has reported on unequal access to education for Roma in other countries, including Greece and Denmark. In a 2004 Danish case, Roma were placed into separate classes in one particular locality. Following complaints from a Romani non-governmental organization, the Danish Ministry of Education intervened to end this practice. In the case of Greece, the Greek Helsinki Monitor has reported on several localities where Roma are denied equal access to schools. These cases remain unresolved.
In Hungary and Bulgaria, some efforts to litigate this issue have made their way into the courts, with mixed results.
Education is a prerequisite to the participation of Roma and Sinti people in the political, social and economic life of their respective countries on a footing of equality with others. Strong immediate measures in this field, particularly those that foster school attendance and combat illiteracy, should be assigned the highest priority both by decision-makers and by Roma and Sinti communities. Educational policies should aim to integrate Roma and Sinti people into mainstream education by providing full and equal access at all levels, while remaining sensitive to cultural differences.
- OSCE Action Plan on Improving the Situation of Roma and Sinti within the OSCE Area, 2003
In October 2004, the Budapest Metropolitan City Court of Appeals upheld a lower court decision ordering a primary school and the local government of Tiszatarjan to pay damages to nine Romani families whose children were wrongly placed in “special schools” between 1994 and 1999. In June 2005, a court dismissed a case brought against the Miskolc Municipality alleging city-wide segregation. A Hungarian non-governmental organization which assisted in filing the suit, Chance for Children Foundation, is appealing. Other legal disputes continue to surround a self-proclaimed “private school” in Jaszladany (established at least in part with municipal resources). A study commissioned by the Ministry of Education found the “private school” violated the law and contributed to racial segregation.
Notwithstanding some recent government initiatives to address this problem in Hungary, desegregation initiatives have met resistance in significant quarters. Former Prime Minister Victor Orban (who also heads of Hungary’s largest opposition party, FIDESZ), argued in a speech on January 29, 2006, that integrated schooling should not be mandatory, but left to local officials and parents to “choose” or reject. In fact, the greatest resistance to integrated schooling often comes at the local level.
In Bulgaria – where the government continues to deal with Roma through an office for “demographic issues” – efforts to address the causes of segregation have largely originated with the non-governmental community. Particularly promising results have been achieved in Viden, where community-based efforts, supported by international non-governmental organizations, have resulted in integrating Roma and ethnic Bulgarian school children. Efforts to replicate that program elsewhere, however, have not been embraced by the government.
In addition, in a landmark holding, the Sofia District Court held on October 25, 2005, that the Bulgarian Ministry of Education, the Sofia Municipality and School Number 103 of Sofia violated the prohibition of racial segregation and unequal treatment provided in Bulgarian and international law. In welcoming that ruling, the European Roma Rights Center declared, “After a period of 51 years, the soul of Brown v. Board of Education has crossed the Atlantic.”
Helsinki Commission Welcomes Unveiling of Berlin Memorial for Romani Genocide Victims Article
Dec 19, 2011
U.S. Helsinki Commission Leaders Mourn Passing of Vaclav Havel Press Release
Jul 29, 2011
U.S. Helsinki Commission Welcomes Recognition of Romani Victims of Nazi Genocide; Urges Other European Nations to Act Press Release
Jun 28, 2011
NEW ROOM: Helsinki Commission to Screen Award-Winning Documentary Press Release
Apr 8, 2011
Commemorating International Roma Day Article
Mar 22, 2011
U.S. Helsinki Commissioners Call on Slovakia to Acknowledge and Condemn Past Practice of Targeting Roma for Sterilization Press Release
Jan 28, 2011
The Year in Review: The 2010 Supplementary Human Dimension Meetings Article
Dec 12, 2010
Helsinki Commission Concerned with Proposed Law to Change Roma Term Press Release
Dec 8, 2010
Helsinki Commission Hearing Focuses on U.S. Support for Western Balkan Countries Press Release
Dec 2, 2010
Commission to Hold Hearing on Challenges in Western Balkans Press Release
Nov 15, 2010
Watch now: The Helsinki Commission Story Press Release
Oct 21, 2010
Co-Chairs Welcome Justice in Attack on Romani Household Press Release
Oct 19, 2010
Photo Release: Commission Hosts Roundtable Discussion on Roma Situation Press Release
Oct 6, 2010
Commission Event Raises Roma Concerns at International Human Rights Conference Press Release
Sep 15, 2010
Hastings Raises Cause of Roma, Muslims through Commission Minority Events with French Delegation Press Release
Aug 3, 2010
Commission Marks 35 Years of Helsinki Final Act Press Release
Jul 27, 2010
Copenhagen Anniversary Conference: 20 Years of the Copenhagen Document Article
Jul 5, 2010
Senator Cardin to Lead Congressional Delegation to Norway Press Release
Mar 24, 2010
Commission Briefing on Racial Profiling Marks Day Against Discrimination Press Release
Feb 17, 2010
Cardin Calls for Further Integration of Roma Press Release
Feb 2, 2010
Commission Calls for Kazakhstan to Lead OSCE by Example Press Release
Jan 27, 2010
The Year in Review: OSCE Human Dimension Activities in 2009 Article
Dec 3, 2009
Chairman Cardin Meets with Hungarian Prime Minister Bajnai Press Release
Nov 23, 2009
Helsinki Commissioners Seek Justice for Victims of Sterilization in Czech Republic and Slovakia Press Release
Nov 6, 2009
Energy Security and the Future of the OSCE Mediterranean Dimension Headline OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Fall Meetings in Athens Article
Oct 14, 2009
Cardin, Hastings Among First to Meet New Greek Prime Minister Press Release
Oct 8, 2009
Helsinki Commission Applauds Unveiling of Romania Holocaust Monument Press Release
Sep 30, 2009
Co-Chairmen Applaud Ukraine Decision to Protect Babyn Yar (Babi Yar) Memorial Press Release
Jun 9, 2009
Helsinki Commissioners Condemn Violence Against Roma Press Release
Jun 2, 2009
U.S. Helsinki Commission to Hold Briefing on Rise of Violence Against Roma Press Release
May 20, 2009
U.S. Helsinki Commission Chairman Cardin and Co-Chairman Hastings Condemn Turkish Government Destruction of Nearly 1,000-Year-Old Roma Neighborhood Press Release
Apr 29, 2009
Slovak Romani Sterilization Victims Win Damages Press Release
Apr 16, 2009
International Roma Day Bracketed by Rising Extremism and Violence Article
Apr 8, 2009
U.S. Helsinki Commission Chairman Cardin and Co-Chairman Hastings Release Statement on Plight of Roma Press Release
Jan 22, 2009
Helsinki Commission Staff Examine Impact of International Efforts in Kosovo on Human Rights Article
Dec 19, 2008
Helsinki Commission Welcomes Groundbreaking of Romani Memorial in Berlin Press Release
Nov 18, 2008
Report on the OSCE’s 2008 Human Dimension Implementation Meeting Article
Aug 11, 2008
OSCE 101: Briefing for Civil Society Press Release
Jul 15, 2008
Italian Fingerprinting Targeting Romani Communities Triggers Protests; OSCE Pledges Fact-Finding Article
Jul 7, 2008
Helsinki Commission Co-Chairmen Express Alarm Over Fingerprinting of Roma by Italian Authorities Press Release
May 27, 2008
U.S. Helsinki Commission to Hold Hearing on the Challenges to Minority Communities in Kosovo Press Release
Apr 7, 2008
U.S. Helsinki Commission Urges Respect for Human Rights of Roma Press Release
Mar 11, 2008
Helsinki Commission Delegation Visits Prague and Bratislava Article
Aug 13, 2007
Sustaining the fight: Combating Anti-Semitism and other forms of intolerance within the OSCE Article
Mar 19, 2007
Parliamentary Elections in Serbia Reveal Progress in Democratic Development But also Support for Nationalist Causes Article
Mar 15, 2007
Helsinki Commissioners Meet with Vaclav Havel, Commemorate 30th Anniversary of Charter 77 Movement Article
Aug 14, 2006
Helsinki Commission Report Describes Investigations Into Wrongful Sterilizations in Slovakia and Czech Republic Press Release
Aug 7, 2006
Helsinki Commission to Hold Briefing on the Sterilization Investigation in the Czech Republic Press Release
Jun 13, 2006
From Promises to Practice Article
Jun 8, 2006
Helsinki Commission to Hold
Briefing on Situation of Roma Press Release
Jun 7, 2006
Helsinki Commission to Hold
Hearing on South Central Europe Press Release
Apr 26, 2006
Helsinki Commissioners Voice Alarm at Surge of Violent Attacks and Murders of Minorities in Russia Press Release
Feb 21, 2006
European Court Rules in Critical Czech Desegregation Case Article
Feb 10, 2006
Helsinki Commissioners Praise Courage of Romani Plaintiffs in Czech Desegregation Case, Call for Intensified Integration of Roma in Schools Press Release
May 26, 2005
Kosovo Human Rights Still At Risk, Helsinki Commission Members Find Press Release
Mar 2, 2005
Helsinki Commission Leaders Condemn Attack Against Roma Community in Siberia Press Release
Oct 15, 2004
Briefing Surveys Human Rights of
Russia's Roma Population Article
Sep 20, 2004
Helsinki Commission Briefing Surveys
Plight of Russia’s Roma Minority Press Release
Jan 16, 2004
Strong Substance, Potent Politics Mark
Historic Maastricht OSCE Ministerial Council Article
Dec 22, 2003
Romania: Moving Toward NATO and the EU Article
Nov 26, 2003
Full Text of Congressional Letter to
Prime Minister Dzurinda of Slovakia Press Release
Nov 26, 2003
Helsinki Commissioners Urge Slovakia
to Institute Sterilization Safeguards Press Release
Jul 31, 2003
Helsinki Commission Chairman Recalls
Romani Holocaust Tragedy Press Release
Apr 8, 2003
Helsinki Commission Releases Report on
Coerced Sterilization of Roma Press Release
Mar 12, 2003
Helsinki Commission Co-Chairman Smith
Meets with Slovak Deputy Foreign Minister Press Release
Mar 12, 2003
Full Text of Letter to Slovak Prime Minister
on Coerced Sterilization of Romani Women Press Release
Nov 6, 2002
OSCE Commitments: Special Relevance to Roma Article
Aug 1, 2002
Helsinki Commission Leaders Recall
Romani Holocaust Tragedy
Press Release
Apr 19, 2002
Journalist’s Attempted Hand-Shake
Leads to Criminal Indictment
Press Release
Apr 9, 2002
Racism at the Heart of
Romani Human Rights Abuses,
Witnesses Tell Helsinki Commission
Press Release
Apr 3, 2002
Romani Human Rights Focus of
Helsinki Commission Hearing
Press Release
Sep 21, 2001
Helsinki Commission Releases
U.S. Statement on Roma and Sinti at
OSCE Human Dimension Implementation Meeting
Press Release
Aug 3, 2001
Helsinki Commissioners Remember
Romani Holocaust Press Release
May 29, 2001
Helsinki Commission Leaders
Denounce Slovak Passport Plan Press Release
Jan 31, 2001
Geoana Discusses OSCE Priorities with
Helsinki Commission Leaders Press Release
Aug 25, 2000
Helsinki Commission Chairman
Decries Murder of Romani Woman Press Release
Aug 1, 2000
Helsinki Commission Chairman
Remembers Romani Holocaust Press Release
Jun 9, 2000
Anti-Discrimination Laws Needed, Witnesses Testify at Helsinki Commission Hearing on Roma Press Release
Apr 7, 2000
Helsinki Commission Chairman
Welcomes OSCE Report on Roma Press Release
Oct 20, 1999
Czech Prime Minister Commended by Helsinki Commission
for Condemning Roma Ghetto in Usti nad Labem Press Release
Oct 15, 1999
Helsinki Commissioners Voice Outrage Over Wall Press Release
Jul 13, 1999
Commission Chairman Welcomes Vote on Czech Citizenship Press Release
Jun 2, 1999
Selected Reporting on Romani Human Rights from the U.S. Department of State's Annual Country Reports on Human Rights for Calendar Year 1998 Article
May 27, 1999
Commission Chairman Praises
Czech Government Decision Press Release
Jan 21, 1999
Helsinki Commissioners
Reps. Smith and Hoyer Discuss Keys Issues with
Czech Deputy Foreign Minister Palous Press Release
Jan 21, 1999
Helsinki Commissioners Reps. Smith and Hoyer
Urge Czech Leaders to Condemn Xenophobic Attacks Press Release
Sep 1, 1996
Report: Ex Post Facto Problems of the Czech Citizenship Law Article
May 23, 1995
Report: International Seminar on Tolerance Article
Jun 30, 1982
Human Rights in Czechoslovakia: The Documents of Charter '77 [EXCERPTS] Article
CSCE :: User Groups
Jun 29, 2011
Documentary Screening and Briefing on Roma School Desegregation Briefing
Dec 8, 2010
The Western Balkans: Developments in 2010 and Hopes for the Future Hearing
Jun 9, 2009
Hard Times and Hardening Attitudes: The Economic Downturn and the Rise of Violence Against Roma Briefing
Aug 15, 2006
The Sterilization Investigation in the Czech Republic Briefing
Jun 16, 2006
The Human Rights Situation of Roma: Europe's Largest Ethinic Minority Briefing
Jun 15, 2006
Human Rights, Democracy, and Integration in South Central Europe Hearing
Sep 23, 2004
Briefing: Roma in Russia Briefing
Feb 26, 2004
Hearing: The Bulgarian Leadership of the OSCE Hearing
Oct 1, 2003
Briefing: Romania: Moving Toward NATO and the EU Briefing
Oct 15, 2002
Briefing: Intolerance in Contemporary Russia Briefing
Jun 20, 2002
Hearing: Human Rights in Greece: A Snapshot of the Cradle of Democracy Hearing
Apr 9, 2002
Hearing: Romani Human Rights: Old Problems, New Possibilities Hearing
Oct 31, 2001
Hearing: Romania's Chairmanship of the OSCE Hearing
Mar 29, 2001
Hearing: Recent Developments in and around Kosovo Hearing
Jun 8, 2000
Hearing: Human Rights of the Romani Minority Hearing
Feb 28, 2000
Hearing: Kosovo's Displaced and Imprisoned - Part 2 Hearing
Feb 28, 2000
Hearing: Kosovo's Displaced and Imprisoned Hearing
Jul 21, 1998
Hearing: Romani Human Rights in Europe Hearing
CSCE :: User Groups
Feb 13, 2012
Roma Bridge Building Statement
Feb 16, 2011
Attacks in Hungary and the Czech Republic Statement
Aug 10, 2010
Anti-Roma Actions Erupt in France, Europe Statement
Aug 2, 2010
Statement on a resolution marking the 35th anniversary of the signing of the Helsinki Final Act Statement
Mar 15, 2010
State Department Human Rights Reports Statement
Jan 29, 2010
65th Anniversary of the Liberation of Auschwitz Statement
Apr 29, 2008
Teach about the Genocide of Roma Statement
Mar 29, 2007
Commission on Slavery Established in Romania Statement
Mar 13, 2007
In Honor of Vaclav Havel Statement by Senator Benjamin Cardin Statement
Nov 18, 2005
Coerced Sterilizations in
the Czech Republic and Slovakia Statement
May 12, 2005
Racist Manifestations in Romania Deserve Government Response Statement
Apr 4, 2005
The Decade of Roma Inclusion Statement
Jul 21, 2004
Mass Murder of Roma at Auschwitz Sixty Years Ago Statement
Jun 2, 2004
Roma Still Waiting for Their "Brown v. Board of Education" Statement
Jun 25, 2003
International Day in Support of the Victims of Torture Statement
May 21, 2003
Coerced Sterilization Investigated in Slovakia Statement
May 19, 2003
The Continuing Plight of Roma in Greece Statement
May 7, 2003
Taking Stock in Romania Statement
Apr 30, 2003
10 Years of Remembrance: The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Statement
Oct 7, 2002
Recommending the Integration of the Republic of Slovakia Into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Statement
Jul 27, 2001
Romania's Chairmanship of OSCE
Statement
Apr 5, 2001
International Roma Day Statement
Apr 5, 2001
International Roma Day Revisted Statement
Mar 21, 2001
Celebrating Greek Independence Day Statement
Mar 2, 2000
Helsinki Commission Hearing on Kosovo's Displaced and Imprisoned Statement
Nov 19, 1999
Tear Down the Usti Wall; Drop the Charges against Ondrej Gina Statement
Nov 16, 1999
Expressing United States Policy toward the Slovak Republic Statement
Apr 16, 1997
Dogs Have More Freedom Statement
CSCE :: User Groups
Nov 21, 2012
Helsinki Commission Welcomes Unveiling of Berlin Memorial for Romani Genocide Victims Article
Apr 8, 2011
Commemorating International Roma Day Article
Jan 28, 2011
The Year in Review: The 2010 Supplementary Human Dimension Meetings Article
Jul 27, 2010
Copenhagen Anniversary Conference: 20 Years of the Copenhagen Document Article
Jan 27, 2010
The Year in Review: OSCE Human Dimension Activities in 2009 Article
Nov 6, 2009
Energy Security and the Future of the OSCE Mediterranean Dimension Headline OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Fall Meetings in Athens Article
Apr 16, 2009
International Roma Day Bracketed by Rising Extremism and Violence Article
Jan 22, 2009
Helsinki Commission Staff Examine Impact of International Efforts in Kosovo on Human Rights Article
Nov 18, 2008
Report on the OSCE’s 2008 Human Dimension Implementation Meeting Article
Jul 15, 2008
Italian Fingerprinting Targeting Romani Communities Triggers Protests; OSCE Pledges Fact-Finding Article
Mar 11, 2008
Helsinki Commission Delegation Visits Prague and Bratislava Article
Aug 13, 2007
Sustaining the fight: Combating Anti-Semitism and other forms of intolerance within the OSCE Article
Mar 19, 2007
Parliamentary Elections in Serbia Reveal Progress in Democratic Development But also Support for Nationalist Causes Article
Mar 15, 2007
Helsinki Commissioners Meet with Vaclav Havel, Commemorate 30th Anniversary of Charter 77 Movement Article
Jun 13, 2006
From Promises to Practice Article
Feb 21, 2006
European Court Rules in Critical Czech Desegregation Case Article
Oct 15, 2004
Briefing Surveys Human Rights of
Russia's Roma Population Article
Jan 16, 2004
Strong Substance, Potent Politics Mark
Historic Maastricht OSCE Ministerial Council Article
Dec 22, 2003
Romania: Moving Toward NATO and the EU Article
Nov 6, 2002
OSCE Commitments: Special Relevance to Roma Article
Jun 2, 1999
Selected Reporting on Romani Human Rights from the U.S. Department of State's Annual Country Reports on Human Rights for Calendar Year 1998 Article
Sep 1, 1996
Report: Ex Post Facto Problems of the Czech Citizenship Law Article
May 23, 1995
Report: International Seminar on Tolerance Article
Jun 30, 1982
Human Rights in Czechoslovakia: The Documents of Charter '77 [EXCERPTS] Article
234 Ford House Office Building | 3rd and D Streets SW | Washington, DC 20515
Tel: 202-225-1901 | Fax: 202-226-4199 | Email: info@csce.gov | Privacy Statement
Rep. Payne asks witness questions while Rep. Smith listens on at at Northern Ireland hearing. March 16, 2011.
