CSCE :: Statement :: Resolution Urging Ukraine to Ensure a Democratic, Transparent and Fair Election Process
United States of America
PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 107th CONGRESS, 2nd SESSION
Washington, Tuesday, March 19, 2002
House of Representatives
RESOLUTION URGING UKRAINE TO ENSURE A DEMOCRATIC, TRANSPARENT AND FAIR ELECTION PROCESS
Tuesday, March 19, 2002
Resolution Urging Ukraine to Ensure a Democratic, Transparent and Fair Election Process HON. Christopher H. Smith
of New Jersey
Mr. Speaker, today the House moves to the timely consideration of H. Res. 339 which urges the Government of Ukraine to ensure a democratic, transparent, and fair election process leading up to the March 31, 2002 parliamentary elections. I’d like to thank Mr. Armey for his commitment to schedule consideration of this measure this week. I was pleased to be an original cosponsor of the resolution which acknowledges the strong relationship between the United States and Ukraine, urges the Ukrainian Government to enforce impartially its new election law, and urges the Ukrainian Government to meet its OSCE commitments on democratic elections. I strongly encourage my colleagues to support this measure.
The Helsinki Commission, which I co-chair, has a longstanding record of support for human rights and democratic development in Ukraine. Commission staff will be going to observe and report on these elections, as they have for virtually every election in Ukraine since 1990. The stakes in the Ukrainian elections are high – both in terms of outcome and as an indication of the Ukrainian Government’s commitment towards democratic development and integration into Europe.
Mr. Speaker, I think it is important to underscore the reason for this congressional interest in Ukraine. The clear and simple reason: an independent, democratic, and economically stable Ukraine is vital to the stability and security of Europe, and we want to encourage Ukraine in realizing its own often-stated goal of integration into Europe.
Despite the positive changes that have occurred in Ukraine since independence in1991, including the economic growth over the last two years, Ukraine is still undergoing the difficult challenge of transition. The pace of that transition has been distressing, slowed by insufficient progress in respect for the rule of law, especially by the presence of widespread corruption which continues to exact a considerable toll on the Ukrainian people. Another source of frustration is the still-unresolved case of murdered investigative journalist Heorhiy Gongadze [gay-OR-geh gon-GOD-zeh]. The flawed investigations of this case and the case of another murdered Ukrainian journalist, Ihor Aleksandrov [EE-hoar al-ex-AN-droff] call into question Ukraine’s commitment to the rule of law.
There have also been a number of disturbing cases of violence or threats of violence. For instance, 78-year-old Iryna Senyk [ear-EE-na SEH-nyk] a former political prisoner and poetess who was campaigning for the pro-reform Our Ukraine bloc, was badly beaten by “unknown assailants.” Such unchecked violence has created an uncertain atmosphere.
Most of independent Ukraine’s elections have generally met international democratic standards for elections. The 1999 presidential elections, however, were more problematic, and the OSCE Election Mission Report on these elections asserted that they “failed to meet a significant number of the OSCE election related commitments.”
Mr. Speaker, it remains an open question as to whether the March 31 elections will be a step forward for Ukraine. With less than two weeks until election day, there are some discouraging indications – credible reports of various violations of the election law, including
• campaigning by officials or use of state resources to support certain political blocs or candidates;
• the denial of public facilities and services to candidates, blocs or parties;
• governmental pressure on certain parties, candidates and media outlets;
• and a pro-government bias in the public media, especially the government’s main television network, UT-1.
These actions are inconsistent with Ukraine’s freely undertaken OSCE commitments and undermine its reputation with respect to human rights and democracy. A democratic election process is a must in solidifying Ukraine’s democratic credentials and the confidence of its citizens, and in its stated desire to integrate with the West.
During his visit to Ukraine last week, the President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, Adrian Severin, expressed concern over the mistrust in the electoral process among certain candidates as well as general skepticism as to whether the elections would be truly free and fair and encouraged Ukrainian officials to take measures to address these concerns so as to ensure public trust in the outcome of the election.
Mr. Speaker, I ask that the summary of the most recent Long Term Observation Report on the Ukrainian elections prepared by the non-partisan Committee of Voters of Ukraine, be submitted for the Record.
I urge unanimous support for this resolution.